Category Archives: Student Contributors

What’s On Their Minds: Can a Court Sua Sponte Appoint a Guardian Ad Litem for an Adult in a Divorce Case Without a Hearing? Charles W. Thomasson v. Carol J. Thomasson.

“But you just keep telling me why it’s (the trial court decision’s) wrong—tell me why it’s a final order?”

Justice DeWine, to Carol Thomasson’s counsel

“Does the appointment of the GAL preclude your representation of your client?”

Justice O’Donnell, to … Continue reading

Posted in Civil Procedure, Family Law, Ohio Supreme Court Watch, Student Contributors, What's On Their Minds? |

Oral Argument Preview: Can a Court Sua Sponte Appoint a Guardian Ad Litem for an Adult in a Divorce Case Without a Hearing? Charles W. Thomasson v. Carol J. Thomasson.

Read an analysis of the oral argument here.

On November 21, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of Charles W. Thomasson v. Carol J. Thomasson, 2016-1629. At issue in this case … Continue reading

Posted in Civil Procedure, Family Law, Ohio Supreme Court Watch, Oral Argument Preview, Student Contributors | Tagged , |

What’s On Their Minds: Court Tackles Substantial Factor Causation in Asbestos Exposure Case. Mark Schwartz, Individually and as the Executor of the Estate of Kathleen Schwartz, et al. v. Honeywell International, Inc. et al.

“Given the current status of the science in this area is it ever possible to say what is or isn’t a significant factor… Is it just that the science is different from what the statute is requiring?”

Justice French

On … Continue reading

Posted in Ohio Supreme Court Watch, Student Contributors, Torts, What's On Their Minds? | Tagged , |

Oral Argument Preview: Court Tackles Substantial Factor Causation in Asbestos Exposure Case. Mark Schwartz, Individually and as the Executor of the Estate of Kathleen Schwartz, et al. v. Honeywell International, Inc. et al.

Read the analysis of the oral argument here.

On October 17, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case Mark Schwartz, Individually and as the Executor of the Estate of Kathleen Schwartz, et al. … Continue reading

Posted in Evidence, Ohio Supreme Court Watch, Oral Argument Preview, Student Contributors, Torts | Tagged , |

What’s On Their Minds: Abortion Clinic, State Spar Over Standing Requirements for Single-Subject Challenge. Preterm-Cleveland, Inc. v. Governor John R. Kasich et al.

On September 26, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in Preterm-Cleveland, Inc. v. Governor John R. Kasich et al, 2016-1252. The issue in this case is whether Preterm-Cleveland Inc. has standing to challenge the constitutionality of … Continue reading

Posted in Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Ohio Supreme Court Watch, Student Contributors, What's On Their Minds? | Tagged , |

What’s On Their Minds: Mother’s Right to Counsel at Permanent Custody Hearing. In re: R.K. (A.S., Appellant).

“Is that the rule you want from this court—if you don’t show up you are deemed to have waived counsel in the most important court proceeding in your life?”

Justice O’Neill, to the Children’s Services Lawyer

On September 13, 2017, … Continue reading

Posted in Family Law, Ohio Supreme Court Watch, Student Contributors, What's On Their Minds? | Tagged , |

What’s On Their Minds: When Should the Statute of Limitations on Insurance Agent Negligence Claims Begin to Run? LGR Realty, Inc. v. Frank and London Insurance Agency.

“My problem is, I’m still trying to figure out what damage did LGR have before their insurance company refused to defend them?”

Justice O’Neill

On September 12, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of … Continue reading

Posted in Ohio Supreme Court Watch, Student Contributors, Torts, What's On Their Minds? | Tagged , , |

What’s On Their Minds: Will N.W. Ohio’s Last Abortion Clinic Remain Open? Capital Care Network of Toledo v. State of Ohio Department of Health.

On September 12, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Capital Care Network of Toledo v. State of Ohio Department of Health (2016-1348). At issue in this case is the permissibility of requiring … Continue reading

Posted in Constitutional Law, Ohio Supreme Court Watch, Student Contributors, What's On Their Minds? | Tagged , , , |

Oral Argument Preview: Abortion Clinic, State Spar Over Standing Requirements for Single-Subject Challenge. Preterm-Cleveland, Inc. v. Governor John R. Kasich et al.

Read the analysis of the oral argument here.

On September 26, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in Preterm-Cleveland, Inc. v. Governor John R. Kasich et al, 2016-1252. The issue in this case … Continue reading

Posted in Civil Procedure, Ohio Supreme Court Watch, Oral Argument Preview, Student Contributors | Tagged , |

Oral Argument Preview: Will N.W. Ohio’s Last Abortion Clinic Remain Open? Capital Care Network of Toledo v. State of Ohio Department of Health.

Read the analysis of the oral argument here.

On September 12, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of Capital Care Network of Toledo v. State of Ohio Department of Health … Continue reading

Posted in Constitutional Law, Ohio Supreme Court Watch, Oral Argument Preview, Student Contributors | Tagged , , , |