Category Archives: What’s On Their Minds?

What’s On Their Minds: Is an Officer’s Bodycam Footage a Public Record? State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Deters.

On June 14, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Deters. At issue in this original action in mandamus is whether a prosecutor’s office must release police … Continue reading

Posted in Ohio Supreme Court Watch, Student Contributors, What's On Their Minds? | Tagged , , |

What’s On Their Minds: How Many Times Can A Criminal Defendant Be Re-Tried? State of Ohio v. Christopher L. Anderson

How much is too much? Is there ever such a thing? … At what point does a court have to say, stop, enough is enough?” Justice Pfeifer, to the prosecutor.

On May 31, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard … Continue reading

Posted in Constitutional Law, Ohio Supreme Court Watch, Student Contributors, What's On Their Minds? | Tagged , |

The Three Minute Oral Argument in State of Ohio v. Dominic Jackson.

On May 31, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio was to hear oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. Dominic Jackson, 2015-Ohio-1137. At issue in the case is whether a defendant has a right to allocution … Continue reading

Posted in Criminal Law and Procedure, Ohio Supreme Court Watch, What's On Their Minds? | Tagged |

What’s On Their Minds: Is an Order Compelling Production of Allegedly Privileged Information a Final Appealable Order? Darlene Burnham v. Cleveland Clinic, et al.

“We have an incident report on the date, time, location and the witnesses who observed an alleged slip and fall. What’s privileged about that… How would we prevent all discovery from getting locked up in a ‘privileged’ category?” Justice O’Donnell, … Continue reading

Posted in Civil Procedure, Evidence, Ohio Supreme Court Watch, Student Contributors, What's On Their Minds? | Tagged , |

What’s On Their Minds: Constitutionality of the Mandatory Juvenile Transfer Statutes. State of Ohio v. Matthew Aalim

“Even though as you said the legislature sets the rules, the court can say your rules are too extreme. And we can do that here.” Chief Justice O’Connor, to the Chief Deputy Solicitor.

“Don’t states have the right to determine … Continue reading

Posted in Constitutional Law, Juvenile Law, Ohio Supreme Court Watch, Student Contributors, What's On Their Minds? | Tagged , |

What’s On Their Minds: Does R.C. 2307.60 Independently Authorize a Civil Action for Criminal Acts? Jessica Jacobson v. Ellen Kaforey et al.

“Would you say that any criminal act gives rise to civil recovery?” Chief Justice O’Connor, to plaintiff’s counsel.

On April 19, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Jessica Jacobson v. Ellen Kaforey … Continue reading

Posted in Damages, Ohio Supreme Court Watch, Student Contributors, What's On Their Minds? | Tagged , |

What’s On Their Minds? The Application of the Medical Malpractice Statute of Repose to Vested Claims. David Antoon et al. v. Cleveland Clinic Foundation et al.

On April 5, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of David Antoon et al. v. Cleveland Clinic Foundation et al., 2015-0467. At issue in the case is whether the statute of repose for … Continue reading

Posted in Ohio Supreme Court Watch, Student Contributors, Torts, What's On Their Minds? | Tagged , , |

What’s On Their Minds: Police Officer Liability in Hot Pursuit Accidents. Pamela Argabrite v. Jim Neer et al.

“Aren’t you really asking this court to adopt an “extreme and outrageous” proximate cause standard which would be in conflict with the immunity statutes set forth by the General Assembly?” Justice O’Donnell, to counsel for Deputy Chief DiPietro.

On February … Continue reading

Posted in Ohio Supreme Court Watch, Student Contributors, Torts, What's On Their Minds? | Tagged , , , |

What’s On Their Minds: How to Vest Jurisdiction in an Unemployment Compensation Appeal. Marcus H. Pryor II v. Director, Ohio Department of Job and Family Services.

Update: On May 11, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case. Read the analysis here.

“Hasn’t the General Assembly created some confusion by saying the only requirement is to file a timely … Continue reading

Posted in Civil Procedure, Ohio Supreme Court Watch, Student Contributors, What's On Their Minds? | Tagged , |

What’s On Their Minds: Once Again, Standing in Foreclosure Cases. Note and Mortgage or Note or Mortgage at Time of Filing? Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Trustee v. Glenn E. Holden et al.

“Isn’t it a fact that the Bank does have an injury from the property taxes and insurance that they advanced under the mortgage alone?” Justice O’Neill, to counsel for the homeowners.

On January 27, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio … Continue reading

Posted in Civil Procedure, Ohio Supreme Court Watch, Property, Student Contributors, What's On Their Minds? | Tagged , , , |