Tag Archives: Adverse Possession

Merit Decision: No Public Hiking or Biking Yet. Court Finds Material Disputed Facts on Adverse Possession Claims. Koprivec v. Rails-to-Trails of Wayne Cty.

“If a licensee is on the property of the title holder performing acts that would ordinarily require the permission of the owner, the exclusivity of the adverse-possession claimant would be interrupted.”

Justice DeWine, Majority Opinion

On February 7, 2018, the … Continue reading

Posted in Merit Decisions, Ohio Supreme Court Watch, Property, Student Contributors | Tagged , , , |

What’s On Their Minds: Do Activities of Licensees Affect the Exclusivity of Adverse Possession? Don Koprivec et al. v. Rails-to-Trails of Wayne County.

Update: On February 7, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case.  Read the analysis here.

On May 16, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Don … Continue reading

Posted in Ohio Supreme Court Watch, Property, Student Contributors, What's On Their Minds? | Tagged , , |

Oral Argument Preview: Do Activities of Licensee Utilities Affect the Exclusivity of Adverse Possession? Don Koprivec et al. v. Rails-to-Trails of Wayne County.

Update: On February 7, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case.  Read the analysis here.

Read the analysis of the oral argument here.

On May 16, 2017, the Supreme Court of … Continue reading

Posted in Ohio Supreme Court Watch, Oral Argument Preview, Property, Student Contributors | Tagged , |