What’s On Their Minds: Permissibility of Disparate Treatment for Capital Defendants in Postconviction Review of Applications for DNA Testing. State v. Noling.
Update: On December 21, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case. Read the analysis here. “A non-capital defendant is afforded an appellate review that is not discretionary. The appellate court has to do … Continue reading →