Tag Archives: Political Subdivision Immunity

What’s on their Minds: Political Subdivision Supervisor Liability for Employment Discrimination. Anita Hauser v. City of Dayton Police Department, et al.

On December 10, 2013, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Anita Hauser v. City of Dayton Police Department, et al., 2013-0291. The issue in this case is whether a political subdivision supervisor is … Continue reading

Posted in Employment Law, Ohio Supreme Court Watch, What's On Their Minds? |
Tagged , , ,

Oral Argument Preview: Political Subdivision Supervisor Liability for Employment Discrimination. Anita Hauser v. City of Dayton Police Department, et al.

Read the analysis of the oral argument here.

On December 10, 2013, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of Anita Hauser v. City of Dayton Police Department, et al., 2013-0291. The issue … Continue reading

Posted in Employment Law, Ohio Supreme Court Watch, Oral Argument Preview, Student Contributors |
Tagged , , ,

Merit Decision: Court Nixes Immunity as a Matter of Law for City in Employee Claim of Workplace Intentional Tort. Vacha v. N. Ridgeville

On July 17, 2013 the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in the case of Vacha v. N. Ridgeville,  2013-Ohio-3020. The case was accepted on both certified conflict and discretionary appeal. The issues in the case … Continue reading

Posted in Merit Decisions, Ohio Supreme Court Watch |
Tagged ,

What’s on Their Minds: Sovereign Immunity and Employer Intentional Torts. Vacha v. North Ridgeville.

Update: On July 17, 2013 the Supreme Court handed down a merit decision in this case.  Read the analysis here.

On February 26, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of Vacha v. North Ridgeville, … Continue reading

Posted in Ohio Supreme Court Watch, Student Contributors, What's On Their Minds? |
Tagged ,

Oral Argument Preview: Sovereign Immunity and Employer Intentional Torts. Vacha v. North Ridgeville.

Update: On July 17, 2013 the Supreme Court handed down a merit decision in this case.  Read the analysis here.

Read the analysis of the oral argument here.

On February 26, 2013, the Supreme Court of Ohio will … Continue reading

Posted in Ohio Supreme Court Watch, Oral Argument Preview, Student Contributors |
Tagged ,

Merit Decision. No immunity for Diving Board Accident at Indoor Municipal Swimming Pool. M.H. v. Cuyahoga Falls.

On November 20, 2012 the Court handed down a merit decision in M.H. v. Cuyahoga Falls, 2012-Ohio-5336. (when the case was originally argued, the minor’s name was in the caption, but due to a rule change, initials have been substituted.) … Continue reading

Posted in Merit Decisions, Ohio Supreme Court Watch |
Tagged , ,

What’s on Their Minds: Immunity or Not for the Operation of a Municipal Swimming Pool. Michael L. Hawsman v. City of Cuyahoga Falls.

Update: On November 20, 2012, the Court handed down a merit decision in this case.  Read the analysis here.

On June 19, 2012, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Michael L. Hawsman … Continue reading

Posted in Ohio Supreme Court Watch, What's On Their Minds? |
Tagged , ,

Oral Argument Preview: Governmental Immunity for Maintaining Municipal Pool: Michael L. Hawsman v. City of Cuyahoga Falls

Update: On November 20, 2012, the Court handed down a merit decision in this case.  Read the analysis here.

Read the analysis of the oral argument here.

On June 19, 2012, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear … Continue reading

Posted in Ohio Supreme Court Watch, Oral Argument Preview, Student Contributors |
Tagged , ,

Merit Decision: Employer Intentional Torts and Sovereign Immunity. Sampson v. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority.

 On February 16 2012, the Supreme Court of Ohio decided the case of Sampson v. Cuyahoga Metr. Hous. Auth., 2012-Ohio-570. In a unanimous decision authored by Justice Cupp, the Court held that the employee of a political subdivision could … Continue reading

Posted in Merit Decisions, Ohio Supreme Court Watch |
Tagged ,

Oral Argument Preview: Are Violations of Departmental Polices or Traffic Laws Relevant to A Determination of Immunity for a City Employee? Burlingame v. Estate of Burlingame.

Update: On December 6, 2012, the Supreme Court reversed the court of appeals decision on the authority of  of Anderson v. Massillon. Read the anlysis here.

On February 7, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the … Continue reading

Posted in Ohio Supreme Court Watch, Oral Argument Preview, Student Contributors |
Tagged ,